Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anna Kubareva vs Basak Eraydin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kubareva vs Eraydin analysis and find out who is favored!
Anna Kubareva vs Basak Eraydin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kubareva 1 - 0 Eraydin
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kubareva has won 37.93% of points on their second serve, while Eraydin has won 46.08%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kubareva, in recent form, has won 56.8% of their opponent's second serve points, while Eraydin has won 62.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.96% and 46.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kubareva has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eraydin has saved 51.23% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kubareva has won 53.85% of matches played (W/L 14/ 12), with Eraydin winning 68.57% (W/L 24/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kubareva has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 129/ 66), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 31/ 28). Eraydin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 171/ 95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Kubareva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.09% of matches (W/L 13/ 9), where as Eraydin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.33% of matches (W/L 22/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kubareva winning 1 times and Eraydin being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kubareva winning 2 and Eraydin winning 0. The last match between Kubareva and Eraydin was at the W25 Tbilisi, 08-06-2022, Second, Hard with Anna Kubareva getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:50:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kubareva and Eraydin have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kubareva winning 0 times and Eraydin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kubareva winning 0, and Eraydin 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kubareva has played against opponents with an average rank of 218.77 while Eraydin has played against players with an average rank of 204.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kubareva has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eraydin has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kubareva has converted 54.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eraydin has converted 52.99% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
626
Rank
269
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
799
Rank
156
High
29
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
62% (190-115)
Career Total W/L
59% (392-268)
25% (1-3)
YTD W/L
69% (18-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$83,129
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Anna Kubareva | Basak Eraydin |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:0 | 1:50:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (54/85) | 57% (32/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (35/54) | 44% (14/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (13/31) | 42% (10/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (32/56) | 44% (37/85) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Anna Kubareva
Player
Basak Eraydin
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
4
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anna Kubareva | Basak Eraydin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 69% (18/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 67% (37/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (50/53) | 59% (275/193) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 72% (18/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 10 | 41 |
| DFs per game | 0.45 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 23 | 85 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:19:30 | 1:21:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 383.75 | 169.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (220/336) | 61% (860/1418) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (128/220) | 58% (503/860) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 38% (44/116) | 46% (259/558) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (23/42) | 53% (116/219) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (165/349) | 53% (762/1451) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 25% (1/3) | 72% (18/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 69% (18/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 25% (4/1) | 100% (18/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 75% (4/3) | 0% (18/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (8/0) |
Anna Kubareva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Beatrice Stagno
Player
Anna Kubareva
65%
(
70 of
107)
1st Serve %
59%
(
62 of
105)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
15
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
12 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
51 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
55 of
105)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ying Zhang
Player
Anna Kubareva
54%
(
52 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
46 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Kubareva
Player
Marilouise Van Zyl
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariia Tkacheva
Player
Anna Kubareva
75%
(
65 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
51 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadiya Kolb
Player
Anna Kubareva
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
78%
(
45 of
58)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kathleen Kanev
Player
Anna Kubareva
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
49%
(
44 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Kubareva
Player
Dalayna Hewitt
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
74)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
10
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
73
|
2-6 7-6(4) 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Kubareva
Player
Giulia Pereira De Aguiar
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Marina Stakusic
Player
Anna Kubareva
78%
(
84 of
108)
1st Serve %
75%
(
72 of
96)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
47%
(
51 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anna Kubareva
Player
Fangran Tian
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
16 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Basak Eraydin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aspen Schuman
Player
Basak Eraydin
63%
(
70 of
111)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
43 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alena Kovackova
Player
Basak Eraydin
45%
(
30 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Basak Eraydin
Player
Samira De Stefano
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Basak Eraydin
Player
Sandra Alonso
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Rositsa Dencheva
Player
Basak Eraydin
81%
(
63 of
78)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
38 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
81
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Basak Eraydin
Player
Radka Zelnickova
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Basak Eraydin
Player
Alina Granwehr
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve %
44%
(
38 of
86)
6
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
9
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Basak Eraydin
Player
Marina Lubsheva
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
39 of
75)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
12
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ilay Yoruk
Player
Basak Eraydin
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
73%
(
27 of
37)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Basak Eraydin
Player
Dia Evtimova
39%
(
12 of
31)
1st Serve %
50%
(
15 of
30)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
10 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
38
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Kubareva Vs Eraydin Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
